VIP REWARDS PROGRAM & SHOP ONLINE
Houston, TX
Authored by: Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD on December 15th, 2025
Breast Augmentation Success Story Series by Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD | Case Study #06
This is part of our series featuring real patient transformations at The Clinic for Plastic Surgery. Each case study provides an in-depth look at actual procedures, recovery experiences, and results from Houston patients who’ve undergone breast augmentation with Dr. Sam M. Sukkar.
When Rebecca* entered the consultation room, she carried something invisible but heavy: years of self-consciousness about her figure. At 35, this busy professional had always felt disproportionate, her petite frame made her naturally small chest appear even more diminutive in fitted clothing. She wasn’t looking for dramatic transformation. She wanted balance. Proportion. The confidence to stop second-guessing every outfit choice.
What she found was exactly that, and the surgical precision to make it last.
*The patient’s name was changed to protect their privacy. All medical details and photographic before and after results are from actual Patient Case #06. Individual results may vary based on body type, surgical approach, and adherence to post-operative instructions.
Standing 5’4″ and 116 pounds, Rebecca* had what many would call an enviable figure, except she didn’t feel that way. Her A-cup chest created an imbalance she’d noticed since her early twenties. Fitted blazers gaped. Swimsuits required constant adjustments. The gym became an exercise in strategic layering rather than confident movement.
She’d considered breast augmentation surgery for years but hesitated. Would implants look natural on her petite frame? Could a surgeon understand her goal of enhancement without exaggeration?
When Rebecca* finally scheduled her consultation, she came prepared with photos of results she admired, subtle, proportionate enhancements that looked like they belonged. She wanted to fill out her clothing naturally, not announce her surgery to everyone who looked at her.
Rebecca* voiced concerns I hear frequently from women considering their first breast augmentation:
Would the implants feel foreign? She worried about sensation changes and whether moderate-profile silicone implants would feel natural during everyday activities. I explained that modern cohesive gel implants are designed to mimic natural breast tissue, and that placement under the muscle provides additional soft tissue coverage for a more authentic feel.
How would she hide recovery from her demanding career? As someone who traveled frequently for work, Rebecca* needed realistic timelines. I was straightforward: you’ll need two weeks minimum before returning to desk work, and four to six weeks before lifting anything substantial. Strategic scheduling would be essential.
Could we achieve proportion without looking “done”? This was her primary concern. I reassured her that for petite frames, moderate-profile implants in the 300-350cc range typically provide noticeable enhancement while maintaining natural contours, especially when placed under the pectoralis muscle.
Rebecca’s* case required meticulous planning to achieve her proportionate goals. Here’s the specific approach we used:
1. Breast Augmentation (Augmentation Mammoplasty) with Silicone Implants
The moderate profile was deliberate, it provides forward projection appropriate for Rebecca’s* chest wall width without creating an overly round or artificial appearance. Submuscular placement positions the implant beneath the pectoralis major muscle, which offers several advantages for petite patients: additional tissue coverage over the implant, reduced visibility of implant edges, and lower rates of capsular contracture.
The inframammary fold incision allows direct access to create the implant pocket with exceptional precision, ensuring symmetrical positioning and optimal lower pole fill. This approach also preserves nipple sensation better than areolar or transaxillary techniques.
After performing thousands of breast augmentation procedures over 25+ years, I’ve learned that successful outcomes for petite frames depend on three critical factors: implant size selection, profile choice, and placement technique.
Size selection must account for chest wall dimensions, not just desired cup size. Rebecca’s* 325cc volume was calculated based on her base width measurements, large enough to create the C-cup she desired, but not so large as to stretch her skin envelope beyond comfortable limits. Going too large on a petite frame creates unnatural upper pole fullness and increases long-term complications.
Moderate profile rather than high profile was essential. High-profile implants project farther forward with less width, creating a more pronounced, round appearance. Rebecca* wanted natural proportion, moderate profile distributes volume more evenly across the breast footprint, mimicking how natural breast tissue sits on the chest wall.
Submuscular placement provides critical advantages for women with minimal existing breast tissue. The pectoralis muscle acts as a natural barrier between the implant and skin, softening visible edges and creating gradual, natural-looking slopes. For active women like Rebecca*, this placement also offers better implant stability during upper body movement.
The inframammary approach I selected gives me the most direct control over pocket dissection, critical for preventing asymmetry or malposition. The incision hides in the natural breast fold and typically heals to a thin, barely visible line.
Rebecca* described the first 72 hours as uncomfortable but manageable. The submuscular placement creates significant muscle tightness, patients often say it feels like an intense chest workout that won’t release. Pain medication controlled discomfort, but movement required deliberate care.
Swelling was pronounced. Her breasts sat high on her chest wall, a normal consequence of muscle tension and post-surgical inflammation. I reminded her this “high and tight” appearance would resolve as muscles relaxed and implants settled into their pockets.
She slept elevated at 45 degrees, avoided reaching overhead, and wore her surgical support bra continuously. These early days require patience and strict adherence to movement restrictions.
Weeks 1-2: Early Mobility Returns
By day five, Rebecca* noticed improvement. The acute muscle soreness diminished to a dull ache. She could move around her home with less restriction, though lifting anything heavier than a coffee mug remained off-limits.
Critical recovery rules for this phase included: No lifting over five pounds. No reaching overhead. No side-sleeping. I also emphasized gentle arm movements to prevent shoulder stiffness, many patients unconsciously guard their chest and develop secondary tension in surrounding muscles.
Rebecca* returned to desk work at the two-week mark, still tired by mid-afternoon but functional. She continued wearing supportive sports bras and avoided underwire, which could irritate healing incision sites.
Rebecca* described week three as the turning point when she started feeling like herself again. Energy returned. The muscle tightness released significantly. Most importantly, she could see her implants beginning to settle, the unnatural high position gradually softened as tissues relaxed.
Light cardiovascular exercise resumed at three weeks, with strict avoidance of chest and upper body work. Walking, gentle cycling, and lower body movements were safe. High-impact activities and upper body resistance training remained prohibited until the six-week mark.
Months 2-3: Final Results Emerge
By eight weeks post-operation, Rebecca* had clearance for full activity resumption. Her breast implants had settled into their final position, creating the natural slope and projection she’d envisioned. The “drop and fluff” process, where implants descend into the lower breast pole and soft tissue expands around them, was complete.
Her measurements told part of the story: she went from a 32A to a 34C. But what mattered more to Rebecca* was how she felt in her clothing. Blazers fit properly. Dresses required no adjustments. She could wear whatever she wanted without second-guessing proportions.
Rebecca* achieved the proportionate, natural enhancement she’d pursued. Her 325cc moderate-profile silicone implants created balanced upper and lower pole fullness without the obvious roundness that signals “augmented.” At three months post-op, her results had fully matured, soft, mobile, and completely integrated with her natural tissue.
Several factors contributed to Rebecca’s* exceptional outcome:
Precise size calculation based on measurements, not desires alone. Many patients want to jump multiple cup sizes, but successful augmentation respects anatomical limitations. Rebecca’s* chest dimensions allowed 325cc comfortably, going larger would have created visible rippling or implant malposition over time.
Conservative profile selection for petite frames. Moderate profile distributes volume appropriately for naturally proportioned breasts. High-profile or extra-high-profile implants create excessive forward projection that looks unnatural on smaller chest walls.
Submuscular placement for adequate soft tissue coverage. Women with minimal natural breast tissue need the additional camouflage that muscle placement provides. This approach prevents visible implant edges and maintains natural movement patterns.
Strategic incision placement preserving nipple sensation. The inframammary approach avoids disrupting sensitive tissue around the areola or navigating the complex anatomy of the axilla. Rebecca* retained full sensation, a priority she’d expressed during consultation.
Patient commitment to recovery protocols. Rebecca* followed every restriction precisely, allowing optimal healing without complications. Patients who rush recovery often compromise their final results through premature activity or inadequate support.
Absolutely. For petite patients like Rebecca* moderate-profile implants in the 300-350cc range typically provide excellent projection while maintaining natural proportions. The key is matching implant dimensions to your chest wall measurements, not simply choosing a target cup size. During consultation, I use dimensional analysis to determine which implant profile will create your desired look without overwhelming your frame. Various implant types serve different aesthetic goals, and moderate profile consistently delivers natural-looking results for smaller body types.
Most patients report that muscle tightness resolves substantially by weeks 3-4, but complete adaptation takes 2-3 months. Rebecca* noticed the “foreign” feeling diminish progressively, first during rest, then during light activity, and finally during vigorous movement. By three months, she couldn’t distinguish her augmented breasts from how natural tissue might feel. The submuscular adjustment period is longer than subglandular placement, but the long-term benefits, better coverage, reduced complications, more natural appearance, make the temporary discomfort worthwhile.
Yes, with appropriate timing. I cleared Rebecca* for light cardio at three weeks, but restricted upper body and high-impact work until six weeks post-op. Premature chest exercises or heavy lifting can displace healing implants or cause bleeding. The recovery timeline I provide isn’t arbitrary, it’s designed to protect your investment and ensure optimal settling. By eight weeks, Rebecca* had full clearance and returned to her complete fitness routine without limitations.
Rebecca* came to my Houston office carrying years of proportion concerns and hesitation. Eight weeks later, she had the balanced, natural figure she’d always wanted, and the confidence that comes with feeling comfortable in your own body.Your story might be different. Maybe you’re concerned about implant selection, wondering about recovery demands, or trying to understand which approach will look most natural on your frame. But the common thread is this: You deserve to feel confident and comfortable in your own body. Your body deserves the same dedication you give to fitness and health. If these concerns are affecting your quality of life, transformation is possible.
Schedule Your Personalized Consultation here, or call us today at (281) 940-1535 and discover what’s possible for your unique body and goals in Houston!
Are you located in one of these Houston Metro Area cities?
Houston, The Woodlands, Sugar Land, Katy, Pearland, Pasadena, League City, Baytown, Conroe, Cypress, Spring, Kingwood, Humble, Missouri City, Friendswood, Bellaire, Clear Lake, Tomball, Galveston, Richmond, Rosenberg, Stafford, La Porte, Deer Park, Seabrook, Webster, Alvin, and Channelview.
Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, FACS, and The Clinic for Plastic Surgery Team are here to help you achieve refined, natural-looking results.
Offering expert cosmetic enhancements in:
Visit our modern 18,000+ sq.ft. luxurious plastic surgery center and med spa in Houston, Texas, where expertise meets artistry. Our highly skilled and compassionate team ensures a seamless experience, from consultation to recovery.
For patients outside of the Houston area or those with a busy schedule, Schedule a Virtual Consultation.
Schedule your personalized consultation today at DrSukkar.com or call (281) 940-1535.
Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, FACS is a highly respected Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon in Houston, Texas, known for his expertise in advanced cosmetic and reconstructive procedures. As the founder of The Clinic for Plastic Surgery, Dr. Sukkar has set a new standard for excellence, performing over 20,000 procedures with a focus on delivering natural, refined results.
Dr. Sukkar earned his Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree from Louisiana State University School of Medicine in 1992 after graduating summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in Microbiology. He then completed an intensive General Surgery Residency at the University of Texas Hermann Hospital before being selected for a highly competitive Plastic Surgery Fellowship at Northwestern University in Chicago, one of the most prestigious training programs in the country.
With more than 20 years of experience, Dr. Sukkar is a Diplomate of the American Board of Plastic Surgery and a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons (FACS). He is also an active member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the Houston Society of Plastic Surgery (HSPS). His dedication to innovation and continuing education has solidified his reputation as a leading expert in aesthetic surgery, specializing in breast surgery, body contouring, facial procedures, and non-invasive treatments.
Dr. Sukkar’s expertise has been recognized by Houston Magazine, naming him one of Houston’s “Top Docs for Women,” and he has been featured among RealSelf’s America’s Top Doctors. Committed to his patients, he prioritizes personalized care, ensuring every individual feels informed, comfortable, and confident in their aesthetic journey.
Contact Dr. Sukkar today to schedule a consultation, visit DrSukkar.com to learn more, or call us directly at (281) 940-1535.
Cover Image Illustration by: Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, The Clinic for Plastic Surgery.
From the first time you walk into The Clinic for Plastic Surgery, you’ll know that you are in a place that cares about results. Under the leadership of Dr. Sukkar, The Clinic for Plastic Surgery has become Houston’s plastic surgery center of choice. Experience the difference for yourself by scheduling a consultation today.
14018 Aesthetic Circle, Houston, TX 77062
14018 Aesthetic Circle, Houston TX 77062
(281) 940-1535
Mon: 8:30am - 5pmTue - Thu: 8am - 5pm Fri: 9am - 3pm
© 2025 The Clinic for Plastic Surgery All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Accessibility | Sitemap | Open Payments Database Notice | Blog
Plastic Surgeon Marketing
*THE CONTENT/IMAGES ON THIS WEBSITE ARE NOT A GUARANTEE OF INDIVIDUAL RESULTS. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS MAY VARY. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS SITE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT REPLACE THE NEED FOR A FORMAL CONSULTATION WITH A PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEON BEFORE UNDERGOING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR SKINCARE TREATMENT. THE LOGOS LISTED ABOVE REFLECT DR. SUKKAR'S CERTIFICATIONS ONLY.