VIP REWARDS PROGRAM & SHOP ONLINE
Houston, TX
Authored by: Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD on February 25th, 2026
Gynecomastia grades help decide when male breast reduction surgery is appropriate, based on how much glandular breast tissue is present, how much excess fat and skin laxity exist, and where the nipple sits on the chest. Male breast reduction surgery is most often recommended for persistent cases, typically Grades II–IV, that don’t resolve after observation or medical management, or that cause pain, irritation, or significant emotional distress.
A useful first step is confirming whether the breast enlargement is true gynecomastia (glandular tissue) or pseudogynecomastia (fatty tissue). Next, grade the condition and rule out drivers like hormonal imbalances, certain medications, or red-flag symptoms needing workup.
Gynecomastia is a benign breast tissue enlargement in the male breast caused by proliferation of glandular breast tissue, most often tied to hormonal changes. It is not the same thing as fat-only breast enlargement, and it is not a diagnosis that should be made without a focused history and physical exam.
True gynecomastia means there is gland tissue under or around the areola. On exam, clinicians often feel a firmer, rubbery disc of glandular tissue, rather than only soft fat. This matters because glandular tissue does not reliably disappear with diet alone.
Pseudogynecomastia is breast enlargement driven mainly by excess fatty tissue. It commonly appears with weight gain and may improve with weight loss. In real clinical workflows, many adult males have a mixed picture: some glandular tissue plus excess fat. That is why documenting breast tissue present, skin quality, and nipple position helps plan treatment.
Certain age groups are more prone due to predictable hormonal shifts. Pubertal gynecomastia is common in adolescents and usually relates to transient hormonal imbalances during puberty. Many cases improve with time, making observation appropriate when symptoms are mild and there are no red flags.
In adult males, gynecomastia causes broaden. Medication history becomes central because certain medications can contribute to abnormal breast growth, including spironolactone and other agents associated with altered hormone signaling. The evaluation also considers anabolic steroid use, recreational drug use, liver disease, and overall endocrine health. When needed, evaluation may include looking at adrenal glands and the balance of hormones estrogen and androgens, especially if breast tissue growth is new or progressive.
From a medical standpoint, grades of gynecomastia describe how much breast tissue enlargement exists and whether skin excess and nipple descent are present. The most used grading system in practice is the Simon system (1973). This includes subdivisions like grade IIA and grade IIB gynecomastia.
Grade i gynecomastia is a small, localized breast tissue enlargement without excess skin. The nipple position is typically normal, and the chest contour still follows the underlying chest muscles. Patients may notice a puffy areola or a small mound, sometimes in one or both breasts.
Because skin laxity is not a feature of grade I, treatment options often start conservatively. If the case is pubertal gynecomastia, observation is commonly chosen, especially when symptoms are recent. If breast tissue growth persists or is clearly glandular breast tissue, surgical treatment may involve targeted excision of glandular tissue through a small incision.
Grade II typically reflects moderate breast enlargement. In Simon’s breakdown, grade IIA is moderate enlargement with no skin excess, while grade IIB includes moderate enlargement plus minor skin excess. Clinically, the contour is more noticeable in fitted clothing, and some patients report tenderness or chafing.
This is where choosing between non surgical treatments and surgical intervention becomes more nuanced. If the driver is ongoing (for example, certain medications, hormonal changes, or anabolic steroids), addressing that cause is part of the treatment plan. If the condition persists, often discussed as longer than about a year, or creates functional problems, gynecomastia surgery becomes a frequent recommendation, often using a combination approach.
Grade III gynecomastia involves a larger breast enlargement with clear skin excess. The nipple may sit lower, and the breast shape can begin to resemble female breasts, which can be particularly distressing for some patients. The skin may not “snap back,” even after weight loss, because skin laxity has become structural.
In grade III, liposuction alone is often insufficient when gland tissue and skin excess drive the contour. Male breast reduction surgery may include gland excision, removal of excess breast tissue, and treatment of extra skin. Exact surgical techniques vary by anatomy, scarring tolerance, and nipple position.
Grade IV is often described as the most severe form, with marked enlargement, significant skin excess, and obvious ptosis (droop). The nipple-areola complex may be displaced downward, and the chest can have a heavy, pendulous appearance.
These cases frequently require more complex planning and, at times, staged surgical intervention. The goal is not only removal of excess breast tissue and glandular tissue, but also restoring a more typical male chest contour. In higher grades, the conversation often includes scar placement, skin excision patterns, and realistic expectations about symmetry and skin quality.
Gynecomastia grades are not just cosmetic labels. They guide what gynecomastia symptoms are likely, what physical findings matter most, and which treatment options are realistic. Grading also helps standardize documentation across practices and locations.
Lower grades more often involve a concentrated amount of glandular breast tissue with minimal skin changes. Patients may describe tenderness or sensitivity behind the nipple. On physical exam, the provider assesses whether the enlargement is centered under the areola, how much fatty tissue is present, and whether the tissue feels diffuse or nodular.
As grades increase, skin excess and nipple position become more important. Skin quality varies by age groups, weight history, and genetics. Some healthy males with significant weight loss develop skin excess without much gland tissue, while others have both excess fat and glandular tissue. That distinction changes the surgical plan, because treating breast tissue present is different from treating skin laxity.
Liposuction targets excess fatty tissue well, but it does not reliably remove firm gland tissue. In true gynecomastia, glandular tissue often needs direct excision to avoid leaving a residual mound. That is why many grade II and grade III cases are treated with combined male breast reduction approaches.
Skin excess is the other reason liposuction falls short. In grade IIB gynecomastia and above, minor skin excess may not tighten enough after volume reduction, especially with reduced elasticity. In grade III and grade IV, excess skin grade issues can dominate the appearance, and skin excision becomes the step that makes the result look “finished,” rather than deflated.
Male breast reduction surgery is usually recommended when gynecomastia is persistent, symptomatic, and when underlying contributors have been addressed or ruled out. The decision should connect grade, duration, tissue type, and patient goals into a clear, documented treatment plan.
Many cases, especially pubertal gynecomastia, improve with observation. But persistent breast tissue enlargement, often discussed as lasting longer than 12 months, is less likely to resolve fully on its own. That is when surgical consultation becomes appropriate, particularly for grade II, grade III, and grade IV.
Medical management may include correcting hormonal imbalances, stopping or switching certain medications when clinically feasible, and addressing contributing conditions. If the male breast growth remains stable but unwanted, gynecomastia treatment may shift toward surgical treatment, because the glandular breast tissue can be resistant to non surgical treatments.
Pain is not required for surgery to be reasonable, but it is a common driver for care. Patients can experience tenderness, friction, and recurrent irritation under the fold when skin excess is present. Some report limitations during running, lifting, or sports due to movement and chafing.
Moderate enlargement can also affect posture and clothing choices. Even when the issue is partly excess fat, the combination of excess breast tissue and skin laxity can create ongoing skin problems. In those scenarios, surgical intervention aims to remove problematic tissue and reduce skin-on-skin irritation.
For many adult males, the hardest part is not physical discomfort. It is the daily, low-grade stress of hiding the chest, avoiding pools or locker rooms, and feeling like the body does not match identity. That significant emotional distress is a legitimate clinical factor, not vanity.
Surgical options should map to grade, tissue composition, and skin excess. The best outcomes usually come from matching the technique to the anatomy, rather than forcing one tool to solve every presentation.
For lower grades with mostly fatty tissue, liposuction can be effective at improving contour. But when true gynecomastia is present, gland excision is often needed to remove the firm glandular tissue beneath the areola. Many grade IIA and grade II patients benefit from a combination approach to address both fat and gland tissue.
When minor skin excess exists, partial skin tightening may occur after volume reduction, but it is not guaranteed. For grade IIB gynecomastia and higher grades, skin laxity can persist, creating an empty or droopy look if skin is not addressed.
In grade III and grade IV, skin excision is commonly discussed as part of male breast reduction surgery. Patterns vary, and the tradeoff is clearer scars for better shape and nipple position. These are not “one-size-fits-all” decisions. A surgical consultation should include scar placement, the likelihood of staged procedures, and realistic expectations based on skin quality and the amount of excess skin.
Recovery after gynecomastia surgery is usually straightforward, but patients do best when expectations are specific. Swelling, temporary contour irregularities, and a gradual settling period are normal parts of the process.
Swelling often improves noticeably over 4 to 6 weeks, but subtle changes can continue longer. A compression garment is worn for about 4 to 8 weeks to support contour and reduce fluid buildup. Follow-up visits monitor for seroma, healing issues, and early asymmetry.
Return to activity follows stages. Light walking starts early, while heavy lifting and strenuous chest workouts wait. Many patients resume exercise around 4 to 6 weeks, depending on the extent of excision and skin removal.
Gynecomastia surgery scars depends on incision choice. Lower-grade cases may have limited scarring around the areola. Higher grades that require skin excision patterns will have more visible scars, though they often fade with time and proper care.
Potential risks include contour irregularities, asymmetry, hematoma, and changes in nipple sensation. Sensation changes are often temporary, but a small percentage of patients experience persistent changes (about 5–10%). Revision risk is generally low, but it increases with higher grades, major skin laxity, and complex anatomy. Clear pre-op counseling reduces dissatisfaction and supports better outcomes across multi-site practices.
Gynecomastia grades (commonly the Simon Grade I–IV system) describe how much glandular tissue is present, how much excess fat and skin laxity exist, and whether the nipple has dropped. These factors guide whether male breast reduction surgery is needed and which techniques will work.
True gynecomastia is glandular tissue, often felt as a firm, rubbery disc under the areola. Pseudogynecomastia is mostly soft fatty tissue. This distinction matters because fat may improve with weight loss, while glandular tissue usually doesn’t. Many patients have both, so treatment is often combined.
Liposuction removes fatty tissue but doesn’t reliably remove firm glandular breast tissue in true gynecomastia. It also can’t correct significant skin excess or nipple droop. In grades IIB–IV, treatment combines liposuction with gland excision, and in Grade III–IV, treatment may require skin excision to create a firm, masculine contour.
In gynecomastia surgery recovery, most swelling improves over about 4–6 weeks, though subtle settling can take longer. Patients typically wear a compression garment for about 4–8 weeks to support contour and reduce fluid buildup. Light walking usually starts early. Heavy lifting and chest workouts wait about 4–6 weeks, depending on the procedure.
Sometimes, insurance covers gynecomastia, but only when it meets medical-necessity criteria rather than cosmetic concerns. Coverage usually requires documented glandular breast tissue, persistent symptoms, and proof that observation or medical treatment did not resolve the condition. Male breast reduction cost in Houston, TX ranges from $9,500 up to $13,000.
Gynecomastia grading connects the physical findings to realistic treatment choices. Lower grades often focus on removing gland tissue and contouring fat, while higher grades require planning for skin excess and nipple position. The most important step is identifying the tissue type, duration, and contributing factors so treatment matches the actual problem.
Male breast reduction becomes appropriate when breast enlargement persists, causes discomfort or irritation, or affects daily confidence and activities after observation or medical management. With proper evaluation and a technique chosen for the grade and anatomy, most patients achieve a durable improvement in chest contour and comfort.
Are you located in one of these Houston Metro Area cities?
Houston, The Woodlands, Sugar Land, Katy, Pearland, Pasadena, League City, Baytown, Conroe, Cypress, Spring, Kingwood, Humble, Missouri City, Friendswood, Bellaire, Clear Lake, Tomball, Galveston, Richmond, Rosenberg, Stafford, La Porte, Deer Park, Seabrook, Webster, Alvin, and Channelview.
Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, FACS, and the The Clinic for Plastic Surgery Team provide advanced surgical solutions for men struggling with enlarged or excess breast tissue.
If you are man experiencing excess chest fat, glandular tissue, or persistent male breast enlargement, we offer comprehensive gynecomastia treatment options, including:
Visit our modern 18,000+ sq. ft. plastic surgery center and med spa in Houston, Texas, designed for comfort, privacy, and results-driven care. From your initial consultation through recovery, our experienced team focuses on natural-looking chest contours and long-term confidence.
For patients outside the Houston area or those with limited availability, schedule a virtual gynecomastia consultation.
Book Your Male Breast Reduction Consultation today at DrSukkar.com or call (281) 940-1535
Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, FACS is a highly respected Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon in Houston, Texas, known for his expertise in advanced cosmetic and reconstructive procedures. As the founder of The Clinic for Plastic Surgery, Dr. Sukkar has set a new standard for excellence, performing over 20,000 procedures with a focus on delivering natural, refined results.
Dr. Sukkar earned his Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree from Louisiana State University School of Medicine in 1992 after graduating summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in Microbiology. He then completed an intensive General Surgery Residency at the University of Texas Hermann Hospital before being selected for a highly competitive Plastic Surgery Fellowship at Northwestern University in Chicago, one of the most prestigious training programs in the country.
With more than 20 years of experience, Dr. Sukkar is a Diplomate of the American Board of Plastic Surgery and a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons (FACS). He is also an active member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the Houston Society of Plastic Surgery (HSPS). His dedication to innovation and continuing education has solidified his reputation as a leading expert in aesthetic surgery, specializing in breast surgery, body contouring, facial procedures, and non-invasive treatments.
Dr. Sukkar’s expertise has been recognized by Houston Magazine, naming him one of Houston’s “Top Docs for Women,” and he has been featured among RealSelf’s America’s Top Doctors. Committed to his patients, he prioritizes personalized care, ensuring every individual feels informed, comfortable, and confident in their aesthetic journey.
Contact Dr. Sukkar today to schedule a consultation, visit DrSukkar.com to learn more, or call us directly at (281) 940-1535.
Cover Image Illustration by: Dr. Sam Sukkar, MD, The Clinic for Plastic Surgery.
From the first time you walk into The Clinic for Plastic Surgery, you’ll know that you are in a place that cares about results. Under the leadership of Dr. Sukkar, The Clinic for Plastic Surgery has become Houston’s plastic surgery center of choice. Experience the difference for yourself by scheduling a consultation today.
14018 Aesthetic Circle, Houston, TX 77062
14018 Aesthetic Circle, Houston TX 77062
(281) 940-1535
Mon: 8:30am - 5pmTue - Thu: 8am - 5pm Fri: 9am - 3pm
© 2026 The Clinic for Plastic Surgery All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Accessibility | Sitemap | Open Payments Database Notice | Blog
Plastic Surgeon Marketing
*THE CONTENT/IMAGES ON THIS WEBSITE ARE NOT A GUARANTEE OF INDIVIDUAL RESULTS. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS MAY VARY. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS SITE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT REPLACE THE NEED FOR A FORMAL CONSULTATION WITH A PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEON BEFORE UNDERGOING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR SKINCARE TREATMENT. THE LOGOS LISTED ABOVE REFLECT DR. SUKKAR'S CERTIFICATIONS ONLY.
